Heard it through the grapevine

Aug 02 2011 by Brian Amble Print This Article

In October 2008, a rumor that Apple CEO Steve Jobs had suffered a serious heart attack swept the financial markets, resulting in a $9 billion market value loss. This June, a hoax picture of a McDonald's restaurant sign charging extra to African-American customers sent the Twittersphere into a frenzy while McDonald's executives hurried to quash the rumor.

Although rumors such as Jobs' health issue and the McDonald's sign were obviously false, how do rumors end up being perceived as true statements?

A new study from the Kellogg School of Management has found that a rumor turns into fact because people fail to say or communicate to others the extent to which they are certain of the rumor's truth.

"This study shows how powerful certainty is in information transmission," said study co-author Derek Rucker, an associate professor of marketing at Kellogg.

"Rumors takes on the guise of being truthful because people don't transmit their doubt of the rumor being false. In many ways, like the child's game of telephone, information associated with consumers' certainty in the rumor is lost in transmission."

This research, which will be published in a forthcoming issue of the Journal of Marketing Research, was led by Rucker's Ph.D. student, David Dubois, now an assistant professor at HEC Paris, and conducted in collaboration with Zakary Tormala of Stanford University.

The researchers conducted four experiments to examine exactly what happens when rumors are communicated from person to person. In one experiment, participants were placed in a "chain" of consumers and asked to pass a message that a restaurant was using worm meat in their burger preparation.

Although initial participants were told that the communicator was highly uncertain of the rumor's veracity, this doubt was lost as the message was communicated down the chain. Thus, over time participants believed the worm-meat antidote to be fact, resulting in a dramatic decrease in customers' intentions to eat at the restaurant.

"Although rumors can start with considerable skepticism or doubt, they can move closer to being perceived as fact as people fail to communicate that they questioned the truthfulness of the rumor," Dubois said.

"This loss of uncertainty can cause consumers to behave negatively, acting as if the rumor were true."

In another experiment, participants passed on a positive word-of-mouth message about a hotel recommendation. Researchers found that although the message remained positive during the "telephone game" communication, the certainty of that information decayed over time, reducing consumers' intentions to book a room at the hotel.

The critical question, of course, is how organizations can put a stop to harmful rumors and instead promote positive word-of-mouth communications. According to Derek Rucker, one of the most effective ways to halt the rumor-mill is to directly question the truth of the rumor.

"Ask consumers where it came from, whether the source was certain, and challenge them on it," he said.

And an effective way to increase consumer confidence is to create a ratings system so that consumers can convey their certainty when they hold favorable views of a brand – something we are increasingly seeing implemented in e-commerce applications and shopping sites.

"A negative rumor can cost companies billions of dollars to their brand value," Dubois said. "Understanding the way that consumers relay information to each other can help fight rumors and manage positive communications more effectively."