British managers are willing to make big sacrifices to get a better
workplace. Nearly half would sacrifice £1000 salary, their company car,
private medical insurance or one week's annual leave, for a better
workplace.
Forty-five per cent would consider changing employer - even if the role,
salary and benefits in the new job were no better - in return for an
improved working environment.
The findings of the Workspace Satisfaction Survey, carried out by Management
Today magazine and property developers Stanhope, suggest that scrimping and
saving on the working environment could prove a false economy for British
businesses.
Matthew Gwyther, editor of Management Today, believes that the survey shows
many UK employers are just not getting it right. "What intrigued us was
whether our passionate interest in the built environment extends from our
homes to the constructions in which we work.," he says.
"Bearing in mind that property costs are normally the second-largest
incurred by most companies after wages, we suspected that many firms neglect
their obligation to accommodate their employees properly. What we have found
is that people's awareness and expectations of good working conditions are
not being met by the companies for which they work."
Managers in Britain are increasingly aware of the importance of their work
space, agreeing that a better work environment can reduce stress, improve
morale, reflect corporate culture, reinforce brand identity, retain staff
and drive up productivity. But more than a quarter of those surveyed said
they would be ashamed to bring clients into their workplace.
Over half of managers of the 600 managers who took part in the survey said
that they would rather have a thinking space away from their desk than
social facilities such as a bar, restaurant or shopping area. Currently,
only a fifth of workers have a designated 'thinking space'.
And almost all managers dislike hot-desking - more than nine out of ten
prefer to have their own designated work space
Public sector managers are more likely to have facilities such as a gym or
shower than their private sector counterparts. They are also more likely to
be able to rearrange their local work environment and benefit from flexible
work practices. There is also more willingness to change jobs or trade
annual leave for a better workspace than among private-sector managers.
Sir Stuart Lipton, chairman of Stanhope, the developer behind Chiswick Park,
Broadgate and the Treasury Building in Whitehall, and chairman of CABE (the
government's architecture advisor) says: "In the future, I think we'll see
office buildings becoming more like hotels - more individual, more
comfortable, with more personality and greater focus on work/life balance.
It's the factory farming versus free-range argument. Most people are against
factory farming."
Good news in the survey is that more than half of managers sit within a
metre of a window. Gone are the old days of senior executives in private
rooms hogging the best views while others sit in semi-darkness in the
middle. The growing trend is towards open plan, with circulation spaces
around the edges of buildings. Two-thirds of those surveyed are even
allowed to adapt their local work environment to their individual needs.
Nearly six out of 10 managers say that the layout and design of their
workplace
has been reviewed within the last 12 months and nearly a quarter have
physically relocated within the past year. But only one in 10 of such
projects has involved qualified architects. The in-house facilities team
accounts for nearly two-thirds of such office design jobs and as architects
have pointed out, work spaces will inevitably suffer as a consequence.