My lawn mower made me do it!

2008

During the week of August 4th 2008, a man in Milwaukee loaded his shotgun and shot his lawn mower because it wouldn't start.

Before moving on, let's do what many probably have done — roll our eyes, shake our heads and perhaps snicker a bit. Now, for the serious side.

For the fellow in Milwaukee, it was about his lawn mower. What about the rest of us? What brings us to, or close to, the breaking point, where we want to shoot something, or smash it, or kick the stuffing out of it?

How to you react to things like a malfunctioning stapler, computer, washing machine, or blackberry, an elevator door that takes forever to close, coffee that brews too slowly, a red light, an ATM that's out of cash? I'll bet you can come up with your own list of irritants in a very short time.

Carl Jung said, "Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves." So, let's take the liberty of stretching this thought a bit and paraphrase, "Everything that irritates us about inanimate objects can lead us to an understanding of ourselves." Why?

First, consider two definitions:

Inanimate ­ 1: not animate: a: not endowed with life or spirit b: lacking consciousness anthropomorphic ­ 1: described or thought of as having…human attributes 2: ascribing human characteristics to nonhuman things

So, what's at play here? Nothing can make us feel what we don't want to feel. This bears repeating. Nothing can make us feel what we don't want to feel.

While blaming and feeling the victim has become an art form in our Western culture, this fact remains a fact. Nothing can make us feel what we don't want to feel.

So, to our definitions.

When walking through Home Depot and coming upon a lawn mower, my sense is you wouldn't rush over to beat it senseless. When coming upon the words "fax machine" in a dictionary, my sense is you don't immediately go into a tirade. Inanimate objects. No life, no consciousness; just objects, things.

When we become reactive, what's most often operating is our need for security, control or recognition. When something takes us out of our comfort zone, when something happens that makes us feel or believe we are not in control, or we don't feel safe or secure, then we (consciously or unconsciously) become reactive. Reacting means to "do without thinking", to become emotional.

Lest you begin to think you are "justified" in becoming angry, frustrated, emotional or irrational and grab on to the notion that some object caused your reaction, consider this.

The "stimulus" of your reactivity is possibly, yes, an object or event outside of you. However, the "cause" of your reactivity is inside you. It is all about you. Feeling the victim, feeling out of control or put upon, whatever you feel, you are responsible for your emotions and for your reactivity.

Remember what Shakespeare said, "An event is neither good nor bad; only thinking makes it so."

Emotions don't come from nowhere. They bubble up from inside ourselves. Our reactivity begins the instant we tell ourselves a story about an event and this is where the inanimate object become animate as we ascribe anthropomorphic qualities to it.

We create a story in which we allow the lawn mower, the fax machine or the elevator door to take on actual qualities and a personality that are "doing something to me" ­ it's making me uncomfortable; it's ruining my day, it's making me late, it's making me unhappy and interfering with my life and my need for control or security in some way, shape or form.

Somehow, this object has acquired all these personality qualities and intentionality that are out to get me and make my life miserable.

We experience the event, we are catapulted out of our comfort zone and we create a story - all happening sometimes in a split second. Our adrenaline begins to flow, energy pours into our head, anger-based chemicals flow from the brain, emotions flood our body and, well, we load the shotgun and blast the lawn mower to pieces, or become verbally violent and explode.

Let's review the Jung paraphrase: "Everything that irritates us about inanimate objects can lead us to an understanding of ourselves."

When the event occurs and I feel myself becoming reactive, the immediate questions to ask myself are: "So what's going on with me, right here and right now?" and "How am I feeling?"

It's critical to be able to name what you're feeling. If you can't name it, then you can't work with it. So in addition to reacting with "I'm angry", you'll gain much more insight into your story if you can say, for example, "I'm feeling all alone (or afraid, ashamed, cheated, confused, controlled, trapped, worried . . . )

SOME FOOD FOR THOUGHT QUESTIONS

  • What negative experiences or events do you consistently or frequently have?
  • What do you not know about yourself that is manifesting in a negative way?
  • Who can help you to explore and see more clearly what you need to discover and see?
  • Do you consider yourself to be a "blamer?" How would your colleagues, family, and friends answer this question?
  • What are your "lawn mowers"? How do you react to it/them?
  • What are you like when you become reactive? What would others say?
  • Have you ever explored the sources of your reactivity?
  • On a scale of 1-10, how positive are you, generally? What would others say about you? Would you feel comfortable asking some of them?
  • What one or two baby steps can you take in the next week or two to become less reactive and more responsive to (one of) your "lawn mower(s)"?

Naming your emotions in this way and exploring why you feel the way you do, will give you a greater understanding of the historical nature of your reactivity and support you to see what's really underneath your reactivity. You'll see how your immediate reactivity is not about "now" even though right now you think it is. It's deeper.

When you understand the nature of your reactivity, you'll be better able to witness an event for what it is - an objective event - without needing to attach your history to it and become reactive (that was then; this is now...and there's no connection).

Why? With a deeper exploration of who you are and how you are, you'll discover and be able to call upon your internal, heart-felt (and not ego-reactive) essential qualities such as: courage, strength, wisdom, compassion, clarity, steadfastness, discipline, patience and will that can support you to cope with life's misadventures without getting knocked out of the box or becoming reactive.

With this deeper, conscious and sincere exploration we develop the capacity to respond to events — with considered reflection and contemplation — rather than with knee-jerk reactivity.

We get clues about our unconscious programming if we watch our reactions, responses, feelings and thoughts about events (and other people). Until or unless we take the time to look inside and explore the nature of our reactivity, life will continue to give us a series of events in which we play the victim and martyr and remain reactive.

Asking yourself, for example, "How do I judge or stereotype events (or people)?" "What pushes my buttons?" "What makes me angry or fearful or sad?" will support you to see what it is that you need to work on "inside" you that attracts events that continually push your buttons.

If you didn't have beliefs, expectations, assumptions, and preconceptions about the circumstances and events that trigger you reactivity, then, pure and simple, you wouldn't become reactive.

So when outer events spark a reaction, we need to look inside to explore what's going on. As Shakespeare wrote in Hamlet, "an event is neither good nor bad; only thinking makes it so".

And finally, it's never about the lawn mower -­ ever.

  Categories:
more articles

About The Author

Peter Vajda
Peter Vajda

Peter G. Vajda, Ph.D, C.P.C. is a seminar leader, workshop facilitator and speaker. He is the founding partner of True North Partnering, an Atlanta-based company that supports conscious living through coaching, counselling and facilitating.