| You are not logged in | Free Registration | Add to My AOL, MyYahoo, Google, Bloglines | |
>>advanced search |
In 2002, Dr. Gratton published Living Strategy: putting people at the heart of corporate purpose (FT Prentice Hall). This book was voted one of the 20 most influential books by American CEOs and has been translated into eight languages. Lynda Gratton talked to Des Dearlove about her research and the broader issues it raises.
More recently her research has focused on flexibility in organisations. The need for greater flexibility, in particular the issues arising from fundamental changes in the psychological contract between employees and organisations of the 21st Century, is explored in her most recent book, The Democratic Enterprise (FT Prentice Hall 2004).
The real trick with cooperation is to understand that the greatest amount of innovation and new ideas comes from people who work together in very distributed networks. They're working across time zones, and so on.
Working effectively in these sorts of projects is really complicated. To succeed you just can't be competitive, because if you are then the whole process breaks down. If you don't create sufficient goodwill, then the relationships become very transactional. Once that happens, then you have to get lawyers involved, and everything just slows down. So, if you want to be fast and fleet of foot, you have to build cooperation. That's a completely different imperative to 50 years ago.
In our research we've identified some of those, so the question is what drives cooperative hotspots? What is it that organisations need to do to create places where they have cooperation which is capable of building innovation, capable of building knowledge, capable of building initiatives? That's the fundamental question of the whole research.
So, the question I'm asking is what is it that these organisations do to develop that and what can other organisations learn from that?
As organisations become more diffuse, so the boundaries become more commonplace, and of course, more complex. So, what I'm arguing is that the practices, the processes and the habits which I believe to be critical are important wherever the boundary is located.
In particular, it is about stopping recruiting people who are very assertive and aggressive, and who are going to destroy those norms. It is also about stopping reward systems that reinforce competitive behaviour and prevent the necessary socialisation processes.
Now, some of those were habits they got because they watched other people. Some of those are habits that they were friends, and some of them were habits because they were selected to have those habits.
So, for example, at Goldman Sachs, a massive amount of the selection process that goes on to get into Goldman Sachs isn't really around how clever you are - because everybody they interview is already clever – rather, it's about whether you're prepared to cooperate with other people in Goldman Sachs.
So the habits are really important, and the creation of collaborative tests is really difficult. It's really difficult to get that right because you have to get the pacing right, you have to get the sequencing right. So, we've also found that there's a set of practices and processes associated with that.
Des Dearlove is a long-term contributor and columnist for The Times and a contributing editor to Strategy+Business. Stuart Crainer is a contributing editor to Strategy+Business and executive editor of Business Strategy Review.
[more]